Sociocultural Perspective Among the Kiput of Baram: a Study of Kuala Tutoh and Benawa Communities

Authors

  • Zulfadzlee Zulkiflee Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • Ifwah Fauzani Chuchu Universiti Brunei Darussalam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v3i3.361

Keywords:

Kiput, Indigenous Communities, Sarawak, Ethnic Identity, Religious Diversity

Abstract

The Kiput of northern Sarawak, a small yet culturally significant indigenous group of about 450 people, remains understudied. Living in two settlements, Kuala Tutoh (mainly Christian) and Kampung Benawa (mainly Muslim), they navigate ethnic identity maintenance amid assimilation pressures and internal religious diversity. Using community-based ethnography, which incorporates participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and archival materials, this study employs thematic analysis with member checking to ensure community-grounded interpretations. Findings show that Kiput identity is sustained through shared historical memory, linguistic distinctiveness, and material culture, while religious affiliation is the primary organising principle shaping settlement patterns, livelihoods, and ritual life. Despite religious divergence, ethnic identification remains cohesive through enduring kinship ties. Younger members express reduced engagement with traditional markers yet selectively sustain aspects of their heritage. Cultural continuity persists alongside adaptive strategies, although structural factors such as state schooling, market pressures, and limited economic opportunities constrain intergenerational transmission, especially of the Kiput language. The study recommends strengthening indigenous land rights, reforming language education, supporting community-led heritage initiatives, and ensuring participatory development planning. The Kiput case reflects broader challenges faced by minority indigenous groups in Borneo as national development transforms ancestral landscapes and subsistence systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allred, A. P., Patterson, S., & Headland, T. N. (2023). Community-based ethnographic research: Methods and reflexivity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, 57(3), 287–304.

Blust, R. A. (2002). Kiput historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics, 41(2), 384-438. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2002.0004.

Blust, R. A. (2003). Austronesian languages in Borneo: Classification and lexical comparison. Oceanic Linguistics, 42(1), 23–49.

Brennan, S. J., & Schulze, M. W. (2004). Cultural immersion through ethnography: The lived experience and group process. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(6), 285-288. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20040601-08.

Campbell, R., & Christian, D. (2003). Directions in research: Intergenerational transmission of heritage languages. Heritage language journal, 1(1), 91-134. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.1.1.6.

Damit, A. R., & Zulkiflee, Z. (2025). Language Shifts and Transnational Migration in the Belait Community: A History of Resilience and Adaptation. In Transnational Southeast Asia: Communities, Contestations and Cultures (pp. 121-142). Springer Nature Singapore.

Dentan, R. K., Endicott, K., Haden, A. G., & Marlowe, D. V. (2006). Malaysia and the original people: A brief etiolated history. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 37(2), 281–301.

EnviroLab Asia. (2019). Indigenous livelihoods and sustainable resource management in Baram: Community perspectives on development and conservation. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124–143.

Gracy, K. F. (2004). Documenting communities of practice: making the case for archival ethnography. Archival Science, 4(3), 335-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2599-3.

Horn, C. (2015). The Orang Ulu and the museum: investigating traces of collaboration and agency in ethnographic photographs from the Sarawak Museum in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne).

King, V. T. (2016). Identities in Borneo: Constructions and transformations. In Borneo studies in history, society and culture (pp. 177-207). Springer Singapore.

Lee, S., & Wang, L. (2018). Language shift and intergenerational transmission among minority language communities in Malaysia. Language and Education, 32(4), 315–332.

Martin, P. W. (2005). Shifting patterns of language use in Borneo. In P. W. Martin (Ed.), Shifting patterns of language use in Borneo. In Papers from the Second Biennial International Conference (pp. 1–28). Borneo Research Council.

McHattie, L. S., & Teo Boon Ting, W. (2024). Indigenous relations: craft, vernacular materials and cultural assets in Borneo. CoDesign, 20(1), 194-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2317233.

Minority Rights Group. (2024). The Kiput of Sarawak: Ethnicity, marginalisation and land rights in Borneo. Minority Rights Group International, 156–189.

Murdock, G. P., & Wilson, S. F. (1972). Settlement patterns and community organization: Cross-cultural codes 3. Ethnology, 11(3), 254-295.

Nauck, B. (2001). Social capital, intergenerational transmission, and intercultural contact in immigrant families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 465-488.

PLOS ONE. (2020). Livelihood transformations and resource access among indigenous communities in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0238456.

Riget, P. N., & Campbell, Y. M. (2020). Examining language development and revitalisation initiatives: The case of the Bidayuh language in Sarawak. Journal of Modern Languages, 30(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol30no1.3.

Soda, R. (2001). Rural-urban migration of the Iban of Sarawak and changes in long-house communities. Geographical review of Japan, Series B., 74(1), 92-112. https://doi.org/10.4157/grj1984b.74.92.

Tessier, S. (2012). From field notes, to transcripts, to tape recordings: evolution or combination?. International journal of qualitative methods, 11(4), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100410.

Thambiah, S. (2007). Religion and identity in Islam and Christianity: Conversion processes in Borneo. Southeast Asia Research, 15(2), 201–228.

Tupas, R., & Sercombe, P. (2014). Language, education and nation-building in Southeast Asia: An introduction. In Language, education and nation-building: Assimilation and shift in Southeast Asia (pp. 1-21). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Wan, R., Renganathan, S., & Phillip, B. (2015). What is the point of us talking? Ethnic language and ethnic identity in Northern Borneo, Malaysia. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 109-120.

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. (2019). Indigenous rights mobilisation and environmental conservation: The Baram Peace Park initiative. Journal of Malaysian Studies, 37(3), 412–436.

Zulkiflee, Z., & Chuchu, I. F. (2025). Belait Language Maintenance in Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v3i1.2617.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

How to Cite

Sociocultural Perspective Among the Kiput of Baram: a Study of Kuala Tutoh and Benawa Communities. (2025). TAMADDUN: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Seni, Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v3i3.361

Similar Articles

11-20 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.